Republicans are reportedly suggesting a shift to chained CPI as one way
of dealing with the deficit, and President Obama appears open to the
move. That could impact the way Social Security benefits are calculated
in the future.
To understand chained CPI, it's important to get a
refresher on the standard CPI, or the Consumer Price Index. This index
tracks price changes of goods and services in some 200 categories. The Bureau of Labor Statistics
defines the index as "a measure of the average change over time in the
prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and
services."
The government uses the CPI as one basis for
adjusting dollar values on Social Security payments. During times of
inflation, for example, the index rises and Social Security payments get
cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs.
"Chained CPI" doesn't
just look at the prices of goods and services. It goes deeper into
consumer choices and relative price changes. For an example, says the
BLS, consider differences in the costs of pork and beef.
If
the price of pork goes up while the price of beef doesn't, shoppers
might shift away from pork to beef, the Bureau notes. Chained CPI
accounts for this type of consumer substitution, while the standard CPI
does not.
And here's the important part: In this example, chained CPI would rise, but not by as much as the standard CPI. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office
says the chained CPI has grown at a slower rate than the traditional
CPI, by an average of 0.3 percentage points annually over the past 10
years.
So what does that mean to you, the taxpaying
consumer? Switching to a chained CPI will reduce spending on Social
Security and federal pensions while increasing revenue for the
government. The differences between the CPI and chained CPI may seem
small, but they can add up. As the Columbia Journalism Review points out, the chained CPI "cuts spending and raises revenue, the twin strategies for reducing the federal deficit."
There
are estimates the chained CPI could bring in hundreds of billions of
dollars in savings for the government while generating billions more in
revenue. The unanswered question, though, is at what cost.
In a recent letter to Congress, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare urged lawmakers to oppose any deficit reductions plans that would involve the chained CPI.
"This
cut would reduce projected benefits for the oldest and most vulnerable
Americans who would be least able to afford it," says the letter, which
also notes that Social Security Administration officials estimate the
chained CPI would bring about a 0.3 percentage drop compared to current
cost-of-living adjustments.
"This reduced COLA would
result in a decrease of about $130 per year (0.9%) in Social Security
benefits for a typical 65 year old," The letter continues. "By the time
that senior reaches age 95, the annual benefit cut will be almost
$1,400, a 9.2% reduction from currently scheduled benefits. Remarkably,
this is a benefit reduction that slightly exceeds the one month’s
benefit for the average retiree."
The Christian Science Monitor
says supporters of the chained CPI believe it’s a better way to measure
inflation and reduce the deficit -- especially as a growing number of
Baby Boomers retire and go on Social Security.
But
there's also a middle ground in the debate, according to the Monitor:
those who argue that the change "should be cushioned by supplementing
benefits for older retirees."
No comments:
Post a Comment